FFXIV Will Have Some Functionality on the Vita


ffxiv_08272013_122515

When Sony announced that every game on the PlayStation 4 would support some form of remote play via the PS Vita, it was only a matter of time before we heard something about Final Fantasy XIV. According to Naoki Yoshida, it looks like players won’t be able to access the entirety of Final Fantasy XIV, with any content requiring a party locked off to the home console. Gathering and crafting are expected to work fine, and there is the possibility that minor questing could be accomplished through the handheld. End-game and party content, on the other hand, will remain inaccessible.

On the other hand, if you play FFXIV on the PC you can already access the fully featured version via remote play. All you need is a smartphone, tablet, or laptop capable of running a remote desktop app, as well as a decent connection to wifi or (if you love paying bandwidth fees) 3G/4G wireless. Yes it involves leaving your computer on when you leave the house and yes it depends on your modem’s capabilities. On the other hand, it will give you full access to the game.

Now to wait until Sony Online Entertainment talks about Planetside 2, DC Universe Online, and Everquest Next remote play. Goodbye productivity at work.

(Source: Kotaku)

Allods Online's Subscription Server Is Here


allods_online_pathtovictory_docklands2

Allods Online is one of the few games to break tradition and transition from a free to play game to an optional subscription. As we reported month’s ago, the free to play title originally launched a separate subscription server in its native Russian host to test the waters. Apparently the service was successful, because gPotato has replicated technology over here in the states. Launching alongside the Everlasting Battle update, the optional subscription server does not allow characters to be transferred from other servers, nor does it include a cash shop of any sort.

For the paltry sum of $15 per month, players will be able to enjoy a server with zero microtransactions. This means no runes, no elixers, no cursed items, no incense, etc. Items including mounts, bags, and pets are available for acquisition from stores and quests, and not only has mob difficulty been toned down to deal with the absence of runes, but player leveling speed has increased 30%. Players who prefer the game’s free to play cash shop portion will find their gameplay unaffected by this new server.

(Source: Allods Online)

Allods Online’s Subscription Server Is Here


allods_online_pathtovictory_docklands2

Allods Online is one of the few games to break tradition and transition from a free to play game to an optional subscription. As we reported month’s ago, the free to play title originally launched a separate subscription server in its native Russian host to test the waters. Apparently the service was successful, because gPotato has replicated technology over here in the states. Launching alongside the Everlasting Battle update, the optional subscription server does not allow characters to be transferred from other servers, nor does it include a cash shop of any sort.

For the paltry sum of $15 per month, players will be able to enjoy a server with zero microtransactions. This means no runes, no elixers, no cursed items, no incense, etc. Items including mounts, bags, and pets are available for acquisition from stores and quests, and not only has mob difficulty been toned down to deal with the absence of runes, but player leveling speed has increased 30%. Players who prefer the game’s free to play cash shop portion will find their gameplay unaffected by this new server.

(Source: Allods Online)

I Don't Think Divergence Is A Serious Game


86924825_640

Divergence Online is the next up and coming hardcore indie sandbox, and you can go ahead and stop reading there if you are as tired of that sentence as I am. Maybe it is the four years of writing MMO Fallout that has made me jaded, but when I hear about an indie hardcore sandbox MMO, I no longer have the reaction of a child on Christmas morning. I have the reaction of his friend down the street who knows exactly what his day is going to involve: hand-me-down socks wrapped in a hand-me-down shirt, and Uncle Rob will get drunk and pass out on my bed so I’ll be sleeping on the floor again. I’ve learned a lot from throwing money at projects like Mortal Online, and the lesson is never invest in the guy who advertises his project as being great because it’s kind of like that Ultima Online game back before EA watered it down for the stupid masses.

So Divergence Online came to my attention in the way that games in this genre usually do: The fans start being obnoxious, I get emails accusing me of being a corporate sellout and asking why I opt to cover “crappy themepark games” designed for “children” by “scam artists,” and how the game they sunk three figures into at an Indiegogo or Kickstarter campaign is going to rock because the developer is an old school guy who played Ultima Online and that the hardcore sandbox is really what the majority of players crave, but are just too stupid/apathetic to see the truth. The same players who months after the game’s launch will be emailing me asking why I bothered to support said game, noting that the more hardcore sandbox genre is viable but that the developer was not the person to bring it into the new era. And they would be correct. The hardcore sandbox is viable, you could look at early Ultima Online and current Eve Online to see that, and yes the problem is that the torch continues to be carried by those not strong enough to lift it over their heads and those strong enough are not willing to throw into the fight.

That said, I don’t believe Divergence Online is a serious game. Not in the sense that I’m implying that the whole thing is on the level of a Stargate Worlds ponzi scheme, or that the guys working on it have any goal other than to make a great game and obviously some money in the process, but that the project is likely to follow in the same line as its predecessor: A series of unfulfilled promises held back by a lack of funding built by people who are better suited for smaller projects. In previous editorials, I’ve pointed out that an MMO is probably the worst genre to pick for your startup game, they take the kind of time, planning, personnel, and most importantly funding that indie studios just don’t have access to. I also don’t have much faith in MMOs that change direction and engine multiple times before launch. Once again it shows a lack of planning and concrete direction, one that often kills even big budget titles like Tabula Rasa.

So my lack of faith in Divergence Online has nothing to do with the alleged antics of the creator, the “jerkness” level of a programmer doesn’t matter to me, otherwise you wouldn’t see the multiple interviews with Derek Smart here. I’ll even go further and say that it has nothing to do with some of the more questionable decisions presented in the Kickstarter campaign, like the inclusion of a $20 emote package that offers a “@#$% Yo’ Couch” emote, a scene from The Chapelle Show whose level of being overly quoted is only beaten by “I’m Rick James, bitch,” and it also gives the “slow jerk” emote, with the reminder to avoid eye contact. The other emote pack for $20 promises to recreate the exotic dance from Star Wars Galaxies, a reminder that you can prove your worth as a sandbox mmo by paying reference to previous popular sandbox games. Divergence Online goes further with its borderline crazy promises by offering a never-ending world that continues to procedurally generate as you walk towards its borders, a promise that will no doubt either be nowhere near as exciting as it sounds or will be scrapped or delayed indefinitely.

In the end, Divergence Online is a story we’ve heard of a thousand times before. Some guy wants to create a hardcore sandbox with full loot, free for all pvp, permanent death, and skill-based progression, and in order to sell his project he will jump on the bandwagon of hatred against anything that could be considered mainstream, because achievements, loot, particle effects, and more aren’t real features and they wouldn’t dare add anything in to insult you as a consumer. It’s a level of anti-mainstream thinking that has, perhaps ironically, become mainstream in the indie sphere, and will be defended endlessly until talk turns to walk, and the same people heralding the game as the next coming of Ultima Christ drop their support with that simple message “this just wasn’t the game to do it.”

On the other hand, I can always hope that Divergence Online breaks any expectations and becomes the next big sandbox title, in which case Ethan Casner may come over to my house and hit me with a folding chair WWE-style. The big sandbox games from Ultima Online and Eve Online all started out as small projects with low prospects and tiny budgets, and while the former became the largest subscription MMO of its time, the latter now holds its place as one of the most popular subscription MMOs ever. So it obviously can work.

But as far as Kickstarter/Indiegogo goes, I’m spent.

I Don’t Think Divergence Is A Serious Game


86924825_640

Divergence Online is the next up and coming hardcore indie sandbox, and you can go ahead and stop reading there if you are as tired of that sentence as I am. Maybe it is the four years of writing MMO Fallout that has made me jaded, but when I hear about an indie hardcore sandbox MMO, I no longer have the reaction of a child on Christmas morning. I have the reaction of his friend down the street who knows exactly what his day is going to involve: hand-me-down socks wrapped in a hand-me-down shirt, and Uncle Rob will get drunk and pass out on my bed so I’ll be sleeping on the floor again. I’ve learned a lot from throwing money at projects like Mortal Online, and the lesson is never invest in the guy who advertises his project as being great because it’s kind of like that Ultima Online game back before EA watered it down for the stupid masses.

So Divergence Online came to my attention in the way that games in this genre usually do: The fans start being obnoxious, I get emails accusing me of being a corporate sellout and asking why I opt to cover “crappy themepark games” designed for “children” by “scam artists,” and how the game they sunk three figures into at an Indiegogo or Kickstarter campaign is going to rock because the developer is an old school guy who played Ultima Online and that the hardcore sandbox is really what the majority of players crave, but are just too stupid/apathetic to see the truth. The same players who months after the game’s launch will be emailing me asking why I bothered to support said game, noting that the more hardcore sandbox genre is viable but that the developer was not the person to bring it into the new era. And they would be correct. The hardcore sandbox is viable, you could look at early Ultima Online and current Eve Online to see that, and yes the problem is that the torch continues to be carried by those not strong enough to lift it over their heads and those strong enough are not willing to throw into the fight.

That said, I don’t believe Divergence Online is a serious game. Not in the sense that I’m implying that the whole thing is on the level of a Stargate Worlds ponzi scheme, or that the guys working on it have any goal other than to make a great game and obviously some money in the process, but that the project is likely to follow in the same line as its predecessor: A series of unfulfilled promises held back by a lack of funding built by people who are better suited for smaller projects. In previous editorials, I’ve pointed out that an MMO is probably the worst genre to pick for your startup game, they take the kind of time, planning, personnel, and most importantly funding that indie studios just don’t have access to. I also don’t have much faith in MMOs that change direction and engine multiple times before launch. Once again it shows a lack of planning and concrete direction, one that often kills even big budget titles like Tabula Rasa.

So my lack of faith in Divergence Online has nothing to do with the alleged antics of the creator, the “jerkness” level of a programmer doesn’t matter to me, otherwise you wouldn’t see the multiple interviews with Derek Smart here. I’ll even go further and say that it has nothing to do with some of the more questionable decisions presented in the Kickstarter campaign, like the inclusion of a $20 emote package that offers a “@#$% Yo’ Couch” emote, a scene from The Chapelle Show whose level of being overly quoted is only beaten by “I’m Rick James, bitch,” and it also gives the “slow jerk” emote, with the reminder to avoid eye contact. The other emote pack for $20 promises to recreate the exotic dance from Star Wars Galaxies, a reminder that you can prove your worth as a sandbox mmo by paying reference to previous popular sandbox games. Divergence Online goes further with its borderline crazy promises by offering a never-ending world that continues to procedurally generate as you walk towards its borders, a promise that will no doubt either be nowhere near as exciting as it sounds or will be scrapped or delayed indefinitely.

In the end, Divergence Online is a story we’ve heard of a thousand times before. Some guy wants to create a hardcore sandbox with full loot, free for all pvp, permanent death, and skill-based progression, and in order to sell his project he will jump on the bandwagon of hatred against anything that could be considered mainstream, because achievements, loot, particle effects, and more aren’t real features and they wouldn’t dare add anything in to insult you as a consumer. It’s a level of anti-mainstream thinking that has, perhaps ironically, become mainstream in the indie sphere, and will be defended endlessly until talk turns to walk, and the same people heralding the game as the next coming of Ultima Christ drop their support with that simple message “this just wasn’t the game to do it.”

On the other hand, I can always hope that Divergence Online breaks any expectations and becomes the next big sandbox title, in which case Ethan Casner may come over to my house and hit me with a folding chair WWE-style. The big sandbox games from Ultima Online and Eve Online all started out as small projects with low prospects and tiny budgets, and while the former became the largest subscription MMO of its time, the latter now holds its place as one of the most popular subscription MMOs ever. So it obviously can work.

But as far as Kickstarter/Indiegogo goes, I’m spent.

Age of Conan Reveals Great Hyborian Race


Age_of_Conan_Armies_Clash

 

Funcom has released the latest Age of Conan monthly Game Director Letter, noting that the planned server merger has been delayed due to the team moving offices. Also on the plate for this month is the Great Hyborian Race, which it turns out is not a new race of playable characters. Instead, The Great Hyborian Race involves the creation of a new Blood and Glory server, challenging players to race each other to the top, with prizes awarded for the first to reach level 80 in each class, as well as rewards for players who meet a certain PvP threshold.

During the Great Hyborian Race, we will be asking players to roll a new, fresh character on a Blood and Glory ruleset server (completely new server) and race to the top in PvE and PvP. For the duration of the event, you will be unable to use Offline Levels and we will place restrictions on the use of XP potions and instances.

Players are encouraged to work together with their guild, boosting each other while simultaneously murdering your potential competition.

(Source: Age of Conan)

MMOrning Shots: Sons of Trigon


dc_scr_DLC8_Iconic_JohnConstantine_001

Today’s MMOrning Shot comes from Sony Online Entertainment with Sons of Trigon, the latest DLC for DC Universe Online. Sons of Trigon is available now for PC and PS3 and introduces a new power, new alerts, new gear, new toons, and more. Premium players have access to Sons of Trigon for free, while free players will be required to pay $9.99 for access.

 

Anarchy Online Engine Upgrade Is Real, And Coming


attractortests

The Anarchy Online engine upgrade is on its way. Stop laughing, I’m serious, it’s coming, and sooner than you think. Funcom has released their monthly behind the scenes for Anarchy Online, revealing that closed beta isn’t just coming, it is practically here. Signps are expected to open soon for the closed beta, during which players will (understandably) be under a nondisclosure agreement. Following a period of testing, the update will go into open beta, after which it will launch to the general public. If you already know how the beta process works, ignore that previous paragraph.

Also in the news for Anarchy Online is an accompanying cash shop revamp and new player experience, the former of which is available now and the latter of which will accompany the new engine.

(Source: Anarchy Online)

EA Shuttering BattleForge


battleforge_screenshot_web_002

BattleForge is a real time strategy game developed by Electronic Arts and centers around the idea of your units being represented by trading cards in an odd merger of Pokemon and Rise of Nations. Originally launched as a subscription title, BattleForge joined EA’s Play4Free library alongside Battlefield and several other titles, offering the base deck for free with the option to pay for booster packs. Unfortunately, EA has announced that the game will be retired this coming October.

The decision to retire older games is never easy. We hope you’ve enjoyed playing BattleForge as much as we enjoyed making it and we wish to extend our sincerest thanks to all of our passionate and dedicated players for supporting BattleForge over the past 4 years. Those of you who still have a balance of in-game currency are encouraged to spend it before the game is shut down on October 31st and is no longer available for play.

The reason for the shuttering is not explicitly stated, but dollars to donuts, the answer probably has something to do with donuts. I mean dollars. If you played, or still play, BattleForge, or just have an opinion on the announcement, drop us a comment below.

(Source: BattleForge)

XL Games Layoffs Coming, Says Report


archeage

MMO Culture is reporting via Media IT that XL Games is about to undergo restructuring after the poor performance of ArcheAge in Korea. According to the report, recent updates including siege equipment were not received well by the community, with many complaints focused around ongoing balance issues between classes. The company’s decision to move ArcheAge over to free to play was apparently not successful enough to turn over the declining revenues.

How this will affect ArcheAge in other territories, where the game has apparently met success in Japan and is set for launch in China with no release date in sight for North America and Europe, will have to be seen. The reports are, at this point, unconfirmed as no layoff has taken place yet.

(Source: MMO Culture)