It’s like the developers want their game to fail.
Continue reading “Steam: Task Force Has The Worst Steam Page”
It’s like the developers want their game to fail.
Continue reading “Steam: Task Force Has The Worst Steam Page”
Enough time to copy The Ring tape and avoid the curse.
Continue reading “YouTuber Recreates Earth 2 Tech Demo In 7 Days”
Nintendorks need to put their money where their mouth is.

Fullscreen Inc. owns The Witcher 3 and nothing you say can convince me otherwise. What? You say CD Projekt Red owns The Witcher 3? That’s impossible!
Obviously I’m being facetious. Fullscreen Inc., no stranger to allegations of copyright abuse, is once again digging itself into a PR hole yet again this weekend after Youtubers began receiving copyright strikes over gameplay videos from titles that Fullscreen definitely does not own. Adding insult to injury, the copyright claims don’t so much list proof of ownership or violation as they do a number.
This story was covered by Reclaimthenet, and it looks like Fullscreen Inc.’s copyright bot is targeting videos of The Witcher 3 and Doki Doki Literature Club. A quick look through Twitter returns a fair number of accounts posting their grievances with the company. This isn’t the first time Fullscreen Inc. has gotten in hot water over illegal copyright claims, as last July users reported having their ad revenue claimed over Doom gameplay footage.
Will Youtube fix its broken copyright system? Probably not. MMO Fallout has reached out to Fullscreen Inc. for comment and will update if we receive a response.
Woke up in the middle of the night, checked my email and some random ass claims from a video from maybe a year ago? I will have to look more at this tomorrow, but is anyone else getting claimed from Fullscreen Inc? pic.twitter.com/ydlwQetxLY
— JoyfulDeath (@joyfuldeath) January 23, 2020
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
did you guys know you can copyright the number 36 pic.twitter.com/dnja297R73
— Anne Munition (@AnneMunition) January 24, 2020
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
One of my videos ( Cuphead Part One ) was claimed copyright by “Fullscreen,Inc”. At first I was so surprised to see the claim because it was a gaming video which was streamed without using any other contents from any kind of sources.. I am a new gaming content creator and Idk
— A Qube (@AQube4) January 25, 2020
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
I already know the answer, but for the record, @TeamSalvato, does this “Fullscreen, Inc.” in any way own the rights to a particular scene in a vanilla #DDLC playthough/commentary that’s over a year old? pic.twitter.com/q8VsUoEQ8n
— Cole Goodrich (@RealAwsome2464) January 24, 2020
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
Team Salvato, developer of Doki Doki Literature Club, has requested via Twitter that anyone who receives a copyright strike reach out to them.
For anyone who has received an erroneous @YouTube copyright claim from @Fullscreen Fullscreen, Inc. for your DDLC gameplay videos, please reach out to alecia@teamsalvato.com with your affected video URLs so that we can help reverse the claims ASAP. Thank you!
— Team Salvato (@TeamSalvato) January 24, 2020

(Update: The Tweet originally sourced in this article was removed by Twitter. We have inserted SidAlpha’s video response as a replacement.)
Today’s story covers Jonathan Slabaugh, aka Jao, head of Beawesome Games and developer of the bestselling mediocre asset flip also known as Day of Dragons. We’ve spoken briefly about Day of Dragons in the past, from the company’s unethical behavior in hardcoding bans of Youtube critics causing their games to crash upon startup. Conversation surrounding Day of Dragons has prompted an almost fanatical response from some of Beawesome’s community base with critics being harassed off of social media and one Youtuber receiving death threats for no longer supporting the game.
But it looks like Jonathan has finally struck a fatal cord in his attempt to silence critics, as Youtuber SidAlpha posted to Twitter that he will be contacting an attorney in response to a failed attempt to copyright strike a video by Beawesome Games. The Tweet contains a snapshot of an email from Youtube confirming that a video posted by Sid had received a copyright infringement notice, but that Youtube would not be taking any action under the belief that the video content constitutes fair use. The copyright notice attempts to claim that a video showing the software interface constitutes copyright infringement.
MMO Fallout has had our own encounters with the sycophantic subset of Day of Dragons fans.

A growing number of reports have been coming in over the last couple of days of Youtube creators seeing their Let’s Play videos being hit with copyright strikes, with the source of the strike being an entity that definitely does not own said copyrights. The strikes appear to be coming from a “Gustavo Canine Games,” a Brazilian Youtube let’s play content creator.
The real culprit appears to be GCG’s network owner, Illustrated Sound Music. Illustrated Sound Music is going off the deep end and claiming ownership of video game footage, something that it definitely does not own. As a result, users are having videos of their own Let’s Plays flagged as identical and having the videos automatically copyright claimed. Which again, ISM definitely does not own the copyright to.
Gustavo Canine Games has posted an apology to his Facebook page and notes that his lawyer has gotten involved.
“I got in contact with the network they claim to be solving.. off my lawyer against the network, I’m being accused by the world for something I didn’t do ;; honestly I don’t know if I’ll keep this channel for much fear, it’s being hell”
Illustrated Sound Music themselves have also apologized, blaming the copyright sweep on videos being enabled for content ID matching that absolutely should not have been enabled. They have promised to release the claims in the next 24-48 hours.
To everyone wondering about the Illustrated Sound Music Content ID debacle, I got a response from the MCN itself. Apparently it was a bug and they are going to release the claims within 24-48 hours. Here’s the email in question. pic.twitter.com/FJNm8LdKU2
— Neronium (@Roxas1359) December 3, 2019
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
Affected Youtubers are encouraged to dispute any copyright claim and not to wait in the hopes that ISM eventually gets around to releasing the claims.
Source: Facebook

Youtube is finally taking the fight to copyright trolls and this week filed a lawsuit against an individual for allegedly abusing the DMCA takedown system in order to extort and harass Youtube creators into paying him money.
The defendant is Christopher Brady, an individual residing in Omaha, Nebraska. According to a complaint filed in the District of Nebraska, Youtube alleges that Brady has sent dozens of DMCA takedown notices making false claims of copyright infringement. The DMCA takedowns were part of a campaign to harass and extort money from the creators, with Brady threatening to send additional fraudulent notices in order to cause the termination of his victim’s Youtube accounts unless they paid him off. Brady is also accused of misusing the personal information that his victims supplied to him during the counter notification process.
Youtube’s attorneys went as far as bringing attention to the DMCA’s built-in risk of abuse:
“Further abuse can arise because of the DMCA’s counter notification process. Under the DMCA, users who believe that their content was removed because of an improper takedown notice may ask YouTube to restore the content pending resolution of the question of infringement. To trigger the counter notification process, a user must supply their name, address and phone number to YouTube, provide details of the allegedly wrongful takedown notice, and consent to be sued by the original complainant. In accordance with the DMCA, YouTube forwards a copy of complete and valid counter notifications to the original complainant. Instead of using the personal information in a counter notification for purposes of resolving an infringement dispute, abusive complainants may use it for purposes of harassment.”
Brady is accused of targeting multiple Youtube accounts although the lawsuit notes two in particular that Brady allegedly proceeded to send ransom letters to, promising that he would rescind the strikes if money was sent via Paypal or bitcoin in the sum of over $100. Both Youtubers publicized their experiences which brought the extortion attempt to Youtube’s attention.

But the story gets worse. It always gets worse.
Further on, Youtube alleges that Brady attempted to extort a Youtuber going by the handle Cxlvxn. When Cxlvxn submitted a counter notification, his house was swatted.
“Cxlvxn submitted a counter notification on July 4th, 2019. On July 10th, he announced via Twitter that he had been the victim of a swatting scheme that day. “Swatting” is the act of making a bogus call to emergency services in an attempt to bring about the dispatch of a large number of armed police officers to a particular address. Given the timing of (i) Defendant Brady’s online dispute with Cxlvxn, (ii) Brady’s false copyright claims against Cxlvxn; (iii) Brady’s receipt of Cxlvxn’s true home address via Cxlvxn’s counter-notification; and (iv) the reported swatting incident, it appears Brady used the personal information gained through his abuse of the DMCA process to engage in swatting.”
All in all, Youtube alleges that Brady submitted more than two dozen false DMCA claims, which were signed under penalty of perjury, using at least fifteen fake identities all of which were traced back to him. The false claims have caused Youtube a substantial sum in investigating to detect and halt his behavior, and the very real possibility that Brady will continue his abusive conduct into the future.
Youtube is requesting compensatory damages for violation of 17 U.S.C. § 512(f), attorneys’ fees, injunctive relief barring Brady and his associates from filing false DMCA strikes, and anything else the court may deem appropriate. When parties file at DMCA takedown, they affirm that they do so under penalty of perjury for false claims and may be held liable for damages incurred by their false claim.
As always, the docket related to the case has been uploaded to the MMO Fallout Google Drive. All allegations laid forth in the lawsuit above are mere allegations and the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty. More information to come as the case progresses.